The April is outraged by the unfounded claims of SCO. The association reminds especially that by redistributing at a time the Linux 2.2 and 2.4 kernels, SCO actually accepted the dissemination of possible codes sources which it considers copied without its authorization
Links:
- Page by the FSF on the SCO affair: http://www.fsfeurope.org/documents/whyfs.fr.html [5]
- Copyright in the pocket, SCO wants to charge the users of the Linux kernel: http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/technologie/0,39020809,2138127,00.htm [6]
- IBM ripostes by attacking SCO for violation of the GPL [7]: http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/technologie/0,39020809,39115745,00.htm [8]
- SCO wants to make invalidate the principles of the GPL: http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/business/0,39020715,39115870,00.htm [9]
- A German court validates the legitimacy of the GPL: http://www.zdnet.fr/actualites/technologie/0,39020809,39150367,00.htm [10]